[TimeStar] Russian research

[Bernie]

Thanks Krsanna - seems we agree!  It's a minefield out in webland, 
and all too easy to throw babies our with bathwater  because of 'bad 
press' .... or vice versa!

Great benefit to all could be achieved by the co-operation of 
assorted scientist - particularly in the light of research that has 
developed 'in isolation' due to political events - often it has been 
found to have taken a different and untrodden road.

  Best wishes,   Bernie.

>
>The real test of any theory application, which is another way of 
>saying the proof is in the pudding.  My observation that stress is 
>building up along the Mississippi was published four months ago, in 
>March.  The article parallels this observation.  
>
>We discussed Russian research, possibly on the TimeStar Talk list, 
>several months ago.  The Russian theories of tectonic formation and 
>mechanics are vastly different than the American.  The old Soviet 
>Union did considerable research in the Atlantic that Americans did 
>not do.  I don't care why the Soviets did the research, the Russian 
>materials I read on the Atlantic were indicated similar data as that 
>presented in the "Sorcha Faal" article. 
>
>The book I read, written in 1965, was published in Europe but not in 
>the U.S.  It was entitled "Atlantis," and the postage from Europe 
>cost more than the book did.  It was a good investment.
>
>The data in the "Sorcha Faal" article corresponds closely with the 
>Russian research.  Historically, many credible people have used pen 
>names, so I'm not ready to throw out data that works because it was 
>written by a man in the U.S.  I'd want to know a lot more about that 
>man before I reached firm conclusions.
>
>I'm not a die-hard fan of Sorcha Faal either.  I don't know anything 
>about her. 
>
>Best regards, Krsanna
>
>BERNIE WROTE:
>
>Whilst I find the Russian data  perfectly credible, I do have a 
>problem with the source.  I have read that "Sorcha Faal" is in fact 
>male and resident in America.
>
>The following URL:-
>
>http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?noframes;read=64027
>
>has a lot more information.
>
>Due to a few inconsistencies, I was not surprised to find out that 
>'she' is under a cloud of questions!
>
>Actual sources to translations of Russian papers in this field that 
>are verifiable would be very interesting;  and let me reiterate, I 
>am sure that they exist.  We are told a fraction of what is truly 
>'out there', no matter where we live.