[TimeStar] The ancient canon/Magic Math Squares
William Hamilton
Astroxplorer at astrosciences.info
Sun Apr 3 16:28:29 EDT 2005
Somoen with a harmonious wave of mind such as myself.
Thank you
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "Harmony Kieding" <ladyharmony23 at yahoo.com>
To: "TimeStar Forecasts and Announcements" <EarthTimes at timestar.org>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: [TimeStar] The ancient canon/Magic Math Squares
> Hi Krsanna, Bill and everyone-
>
> I've long been interested in sacred geometry and
> numbers. A while ago I became drawn into solving magic
> math squares "from scratch" and have put a number of
> them up on my website (more to be uploaded, too)-
>
> Krsanna, you mentioned that "8" and "13" were of
> interest to you. I've got the number 13 Magic Math
> Square here:
>
> 13 Magic Math Square
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/7076/13square.html
>
> (and I'll be putting up the 8 Square before too long)-
>
> Bill, here's the Nine Magic Square:
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/7076/9square.html
>
> In particular, I was fascinated with prime numbers and
> their roles in these squares, so I made them appear in
> BOLD.
>
> Also, here's the link to the 23 puzzle- I'm working at
> getting it into html (and out of the fuzzy gif):
> http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/7076/magicmath.html
>
> Pythagoras had said something to the effect that
> everything in the universe has to do with numbers.
>>From that I got a sudden wild thought in my head- what
> if magic math squares were navigational templates?
>
> That idea may well be nonsense, but the ancients did
> associated various planets with different numbers, and
> who knows- there may have been cosmic travel/astral
> projection going on and the magic squares served some
> sort of role.
>
> :-)
>
> Harmony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --- TimeStar <timestar at timestar.org> wrote:
>
>> Plato's model "canon" was certainly not
>> one-of-a-kind. Several ancient number and
>> timekeeping systems appear to deal with the same
>> phenomena in different ways, and I suspect that each
>> approach is part of a larger system that's been
>> lost.
>>
>> Modern researchers are left with fragments of
>> several systems without the key that ties together
>> the fragments. The horrible part is taking a
>> fragment of the larger system and attempting to
>> declare the fragment the definitive canon.
>>
>> "The Theology of Arithmetic" is the title of a
>> treatise by neoplatonist Iamblichus employing the
>> tetrakys. The mystery schools, of which Plato was
>> an initiate, were sworn to secrecy and spoke in
>> arithmetic riddles that served as a symbolic system
>> for their philosophy.
>>
>> The keys to the arithmetic symbols were NEVER
>> revealed publicly and initiates took vows of
>> secrecy, and the arithmetic riddles that was
>> publicly revealed were exactly that: Arithmetic
>> riddles for the public.
>>
>> The keys to the riddles were said to be whispered in
>> the ears of initiates during initiation. Some
>> information conveyed in modern UFO contacts sounds a
>> lot like the keys to secrets whispered in the ears
>> of initiates anciently. I'm certain you are well
>> aware of the often strange comments made in UFO
>> contacts that can lead to key revelations.
>>
>> "Revelations," the last chapter of the New
>> Testament, contains interesting arithmetic codes.
>> The ancient manuscript modernly known as
>> "Revelations" was discovered in a cave on a Greek
>> island. When this is interpreted as an arithmetic
>> and astrologic riddles, the information is fairly
>> valuable.
>>
>> Many early Christians in Greece, where Christianity
>> got its first real foothold, were not only aware of
>> Plato but students of his teachings. The
>> contemporary Christian interpretation of
>> "Revelations" is a prime example of WHY initiates
>> were sworn to keep the keys knowledge out of the
>> public ear.
>>
>> Public awareness of the arithmetic riddles of
>> Revelations is one of the top contenders for
>> history's joke list.
>>
>> By the way, I've found 8 and 13 to be key numbers
>> that lead to considerable synthesis of fragments
>> that have been isolated from the larger system.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krsanna
>>
>>
>>
>> BILL HAMILTON WROTE:
>>
>> The ancient canon of numbers, the cycles of time
>> recorded by various cultures, sacred geometry,
>> ancient measures from Civilization One -- all have a
>> bearing on this study. Plato gave emphasis to the
>> number 5040. Also the number 3168 appears in
>> numerous tracts in the ancient canon.
>>
>> 5,040 (or 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 x 6 x 7)
>>
>> It is peculiar that the Platonic Year of 25,920
>> years (~26,000) and the radius of our sun from the
>> center of the galaxy is 26,000 light years. It is
>> patterns like these I look for. In cycles of time,
>> the number 9 appears time and again. 25920/9 =2880
>> which is 2x1440 (the number of the New Jerusalem in
>> "View Over Atlantis").
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: TimeStar
>> To: TimeStar Forecasts and Announcements
>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:35 PM
>> Subject: [TimeStar] Response: What's Killing Off
>> Marine Life Every 62 MillionYears?
>>
>>
>> I'm glad to see Linda Howe is finally getting
>> around to recognizing planetary cycles that are
>> reflected in the life of the planet. Whewwww!
>> That's a leap.
>>
>> I'm glad to see you're looking at the Cosmic Year
>> of 26,000 solar years that Plato wrote about, which
>> inevitably leads back to Pythagoras and the
>> appearance of civilization in Greece.
>>
>> All this ties back to the TimeStar geometry and
>> Pythagorean and Platonic mathematics -- the theology
>> of arithmetic.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krsanna
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: TimeStar
>> To: TimeStar Forecasts and Announcements
>> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:17 PM
>> Subject: [TimeStar] What's Killing Off Marine Life
>> Every 62 Million Years?
>>
>>
>> BILL HAMILTON WROTE:
>>
>> New article on Linda M. Howe's website
>> "earthfiles.com"
>> and my response...
>>
>> What's Killing Off Marine Life Every 62 Million
>> Years?
>>
>>
>>
>> © 2005 by Linda Moulton Howe
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Graph of Earth life genera (genus of species)
>> declining on a cycle of every 62 million years
>> for the past half billion years. Graphic © 2005 by
>> Richard Muller, Ph.D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Apri1 1, 2005 New York City, N. Y. - Whatever
>> humans do, or don't do, in this century to help
>> sustain the Earth's ecosystem, it appears that our
>> planet has endured some kind of assault every 62
>> million years which kills marine life all over the
>> world. The last big global catastrophe is definitely
>> linked to the impact of a large asteroid near the
>> Yucatan Peninsula in the Gulf of Mexico 65 million
>> years ago. About 75% of all living creatures in the
>> oceans and on land were literally wiped out to
>> extinction, including the dinosaurs. Could there be
>> a 62-million-year cycle of asteroids, comets or
>> other cosmic debris that affects our solar system
>> and Earth? Or is it fluctuations in our Sun? Or the
>> periodic volcanic violence of our own planet? Or
>> something else?
>>
>> Those are the questions that physicist Richard
>> Muller and his graduate student, Robert Rohde, have
>> been trying to answer over the past few years and
>> recently published their findings in the March 10,
>> 2005, issue of the British science journal, Nature.
>> What came together to make their investigation
>> possible were two scientific accomplishments. First,
>> the most complete study ever done of all the known
>> world marine fossils was the life work of University
>> of Chicago paleontologist, Jack Sepkoski. He
>> documented 36,380 genera of marine life over the
>> past half a billion years. After his death, his work
>> was published as Compendium of Fossil Marine Animal
>> Genera. That is the most complete reference
>> available for the study of biodiversity and
>> extinctions.
>>
>> Then last year emerged a computer model known as
>> the "2004 Geochronology Time Scale." Prof. Richard
>> Muller and Robert Rohde combined the Compendium and
>> Time Scale to search for cycles of extinction in the
>> marine fossil record. And where they began was a
>> discovery that Prof. Sepkowski had found while
>> assembling his meticulous compendium of fossils.
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Read interview at: http://www.earthfiles.com/
>>
>> My comments sent to Linda...
>>
>> Linda,
>>
>> What a coincidence. I am working on a new webpage
>> I have titled COSMIC TIME CYCLES and I start with
>> the Cosmic Year which is the time our solar system
>> takes to orbit once around the galaxy. I have been
>> running calculations and corresponding with others
>> who have run calculations and have found there are
>> cycles within cycles on a Cosmic time scale.
>>
>> Starting with this finding: Astronomers focusing
>> on a star at the center of the Milky Way say they
>> have measured precisely for the first time how long
>> it takes the sun to circle its home galaxy: 226
>> million years. The last time the sun was at this
>> exact spot of its galactic orbit, dinosaurs ruled
>> the world.
>>
>> Using a radio telescope system that measures
>> celestial distances 500 times more accurately than
>> the Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers plotted the
>> motion of the Milky Way and found that the sun and
>> its family of planets were orbiting the galaxy at
>> about 135 miles per second.
>>
>> But, I have found a new estimate for the galactic
>> radius of the sun's orbit at 26,000 light years from
>> galactic center. This makes the circumference of
>> the orbit over 162,000 LY. Now, if this was a
>> simple planar orbit such as our planet's orbit in
>> the plane of the ecliptic, the time it takes for one
>> orbit would be over 229 million years and I have
>> found various authoritative sources stating figures
>> from 220 to 250+ million years.
>>
>> In it's orbit around the center of the Milky Way
>> Galaxy, our Solar system may also do this little
>> sinusoidal motion from the top to the bottom to the
>> top (and so on) of the Orion arm which we go around
>> in.
>>
>> Now, it's bad enough that we would traverse this
>> much more dense part of the ring, but we would go
>> through its' center at maximum velocity, much faster
>> (in the up/down axis) than when we reach the outer
>> edges of the arm where that relative motion (again
>> up/down) stops altogether so that it can reverse. If
>> we didn't stop (in the up/down axis), we would just
>> fly off into deep space and it would be bye-bye
>> Milky Way. But luckily (or not) all of the mass
>> nearer the center of the arm has gravitational force
>> with acts to pull us back in for yet another cycle.
>>
>> It may well be that these huge killer asteroids do
>> not 'hit us' as much as we run into them. Also,
>> traveling at that much greater rate of speed means
>> that we have a much better chance of hitting
>> randomly moving objects because we are 'sweeping'
>> through a larger sectional area of space per unit of
>> time.
>>
>> Now a complete sinuosoidal cycle would cross the
>> galactic equator every 62 or 62.5 million years with
>> a half period of 31 million years. This is data I
>> obtained from a guy named Bob Alexander who has been
>> looking into this, but he used slightly different
>> figures that I used to calculate and admits that the
>> minor axis of this elliptical wave may be less than
>> the 3,000 LY years he initially calculated with a
>> major axis.
>>
>> I useed a calculator to determine the length of
>> the perimeter of an ellipse which involves a close
>> approximation using the semi-major axis and
>> semi-minor axis to determine the actual path length
>> of the orbit using Bob's figures and thus the time
>> it takes for 1 circuit around the galaxy.
>>
>> Within a margin of error I determined that the
>> entire length of the sinusoidal path would be
>> 180,941.0769 LY (slightly less if the semi-minor
>> axis is shorter). This would result in a Cosmic
>> Year period of 249, 698,580 years instead of 226
>> million years and if shortened slightly from errors
>> in estimates to 248 million years we would have the
>> following calculation:
>>
>> 248/62 = 4 periods
>>
>> In other words, there are 4 critical points in the
>> Cosmic Year that may result in mass extinction
>> events. I am still investigating sub-cycles using
>> the Platonic Year, but an interesting thing is that
>> the solar ecliptic is tilted about 87 degrees from
>> the galactic equator (62 degrees from the celestial
>> equator) which means the orbital plane of our solar
>> system is almost perpendicular to the galactic
>> plane. Could this be a product of its sinusoidal
>> path?
>>
>> I admit this is speculation for now, but it may be
>> that we can improve our forecasts for the future by
>> studying these cycles.
>>
>> Bob said, "It is believed that we are about 20
>> Light Years away from the centerline of the Orion
>> arm which is believed to be 3000 LY thick in our
>> vicinity. That works out to being about .006 or .6%
>> (20/3000) away from the centerline if the cycle was
>> linear, but it isn't. And we may not be out of the
>> woods... or rocks, as it were, yet."
>>
>> He also wrote in an email,
>>
>> "William,
>>
>>
>> I do not have any further information at this
>> time, but I believe the numbers for one solar system
>> orbit around the milky way are on the order of 200MY
>> to 250MY.
>>
>> If the sinusoidal path period is on the order of
>> 120MY, then we would go through roughly two complete
>> cycles per orbit (+/-).
>>
>> This takes into account the sinusoidal path (which
>> may not be as extreme as my chart shows) and I
>> believe it is reasonable to assume that at least
>> some other objects would do something similar.
>>
>> Also, I believe that not everything would rotate
>> at exactly the same rate, so some 'slurring' should
>> occur which eventually would lengthen the arms.
>>
>> Perhaps spiral galaxies evolve into elliptical
>> ones (?).
>>
>>
>> What I am trying to establish is whether we are
>> approaching or leaving the center of the arm
>> currently and how would one measure this ?
>>
>> I did put this chart togeather:
>> Period
>> Die out rate
>>
>> 65 MYA (Cretaceous)
>> 85% /1 = 65
>> 208 MYA (Trassic)
>> 25% over time /3 = 69.33
>> 245 MYA (Permian)
>> 96% /4= 61.25
>> 365 MYA (Devonian)
>> 70% over time /6= 60.83
>> 438 MYA (Ordovician)
>> 50% + some over time /7= 62.57
>>
>> The pattern is unmistakable, the average is 63.796
>> MY and I can see no earth based cause which would
>> have such repeatable cycles on so long a time frame.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bob Alexander
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>>
>> Bill Hamilton
>> AstroScience Research Network
>> http://www.astrosciences.info/
>> "I don't see the logic of rejecting data just
>> because they seem incredible." Fred Hoyle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk mailing list
>> Talk at timestar.org
>>
>>
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_timestar.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EarthTimes mailing list
>> EarthTimes at timestar.org
>>
>>
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/earthtimes_timestar.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EarthTimes mailing list
>> EarthTimes at timestar.org
>>
>>
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/earthtimes_timestar.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 -
>> Release Date: 3/30/2005
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>> Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release
>> Date: 3/30/2005
>>
>>
>>
>>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EarthTimes mailing list
>> EarthTimes at timestar.org
>>
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/earthtimes_timestar.org
>>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> EarthTimes mailing list
>> EarthTimes at timestar.org
>>
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/earthtimes_timestar.org
>>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
> http://personals.yahoo.com
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> EarthTimes mailing list
> EarthTimes at timestar.org
> http://mail.timestar.org/mailman/listinfo/earthtimes_timestar.org
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.8.6 - Release Date: 3/30/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.9.1 - Release Date: 4/1/2005
More information about the EarthTimes
mailing list