[TimeStar] Apollo bacteria spur lunar erosion. :o)
Terry
hogoddy at sprynet.com
Fri Apr 1 15:12:23 EST 2005
> http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050328/pf/050328-10_pf.html
>
> Published online: 1 April 2005;
Apollo bacteria spur lunar erosion
Michael Hopkin & Mark Peplow http://www.nature.com/news/about/aboutus.html#Peplow
Images reveal worrying cracks in the face of the Moon.
Pictures captured by an orbiting spacecraft have revealed that the Moon
is being heavily eroded. Images of the lunar surface reveal deep cracks
and holes that are slowly but surely releasing gas and dust into space.
Pictures taken
"This is serious," says Brad Kawalkowizc, an astrogeologist from the from orbit show
Sprodj Atomic Research Centre in Belgium, who has analysed the pictures. the Moon's
"There really is less Moon up there than there used to be." If the serious scars.
process continues, he adds, the Moon could eventually crumble away to © NASA
nothing.
Researchers are not yet certain what is causing the erosion. Kawalkowizc suggests that
bacteria left behind by the Apollo Moon landings of the 1960s and 1970s may be
responsible. These earthly bacteria, exposed to intense ultraviolet radiation on the
lunar surface, could have acquired mutations that allow them to digest Moon rocks, he
suggests.
"If those guys didn't wipe their feet when they stepped off the craft then, yes, there
could be bugs up there eating the rock," he says. "And after three decades there must be
tonnes of them."
Crater fuss
I'm amazed that
Tycho crater, the youngest large-impact crater on the Moon's
we didn't notice nearside, is particularly badly affected. The erosion has already
this before. revealed a large slab of jet-black rock deep in the crater, which
has unusual magnetic properties. "We hope to send a manned
expedition to investigate," says Haywood Floyd, a senior official
with the Canadian National Council of Aeronautics, Newfoundland.
Earnest Sober
EcoLunar
Recriminations are already brewing over why astronomers didn't spot
the problem earlier. Amateurs on the ground have reported, on an
almost monthly basis, that the light reflected from the Moon shows a dimming pattern:
perhaps a sign that its weathered surface was becoming less reflective.
"I'm amazed that we didn't notice this before," says Earnest Sober of EcoLunar, a
California-based charity that campaigns for sustainable management of the Moon. "We've
only got one Moon and it's about time we started paying it a bit more attention."
One thing on which experts agree is that the Moon's disintegration would be a disaster,
as tides on Earth would effectively stop. "This really would be bad for us," comments
Pete Swell of the World Surfers' Association. "Life would sure be a lot less fun. And I
guess, like, fish and ecosystems might totally be affected too."
Time and tide
But others are seeing a positive side. "Without tides, there would be no need to upgrade
London's flood defences for the next two centuries," says coastal geologist Barry Surge
of the University of Middle England in Barnstaple, UK. "As it is, if you live on the
River Thames flood plain, the Moon is your enemy."
John Koenig, director of Moonbase Alpha, a US project to establish a habitable colony on
the Moon, insists that there is absolutely nothing to worry about. "There's absolutely
nothing to worry about," he told news at nature.com. "Do you really think we would invest in
building a base on prime interplanetary real estate that is evaporating?"
The images of the Moon were captured on 1 April by the Floating Optical Orbital Lens, as
part of a multinational effort to photograph the Apollo landing sites. The mission aims
to prove, once and for all and at fantastic expense, that the NASA astronauts really did
go there.
* Well done for spotting, as we're sure you did, that this story is not in fact true.
News at nature.com would like to assure readers that, outside the realm of April Fool's Day,
the Moon remains bacteria-free until anyone proves otherwise.
Story from news at nature.com: http://news.nature.com//news/2005/050328/050328-10.html
[Nature Publishing Group, publisher of Nature, and other science journals and reference works]
© 2004 Nature Publishing Group
>
-------------- next part --------------
Skipped content of type multipart/related
More information about the EarthTimes
mailing list