[TimeStar] TheRealNASA
Stephen Calkins
ecstacy2 at earthlink.net
Sat Feb 14 15:59:54 EST 2004
>> The REAL NASA You Don't See...And How Things Really Work By Ted
>> Twietmeyer tedtw at frontiernet.net 2-8-4
>> http://www.apfn.org/apfn/nasa.htm
>> NASA is, and has always been, part of the Department of Defense.
>> Its in blue printing on their letterheads, and I have several of them
>> from past correspondence. Back before email replaced letters. And by
>> that definition, even NASA is now under the great Homeland Security
>> umbrella.
>> Many of the NASA missions are classified to this day, sending
>> satellites into orbit bristling with antenna farms. Satellites
>> sensitive enough, to pick up the radio frequency emissions of almost
>> every electronic device in your home. Satellites also watch WHAT and
>> WHO is visiting the earth. Yes, they are indeed out there and come
>> and go. Almost like earth is a cosmic Grand Central Station. But, you
>> don't need to know anything about it since it has been decided for
>> you that "it's not your problem" and you can't handle the truth. Or,
>> is it ? Few people took notice when the airforce announced many years
>> ago, the formation of the Air Force Space Command based at Vandenberg
>> AFB. These are the people that fight the deep black (classified)
>> covert war to defend the planet.
>> The US Space Command has technology now that Gene Roddenberry
>> couldn't imagine. But one quickly learns that its really all about
>> sandboxes and toyboxes. Just like when you were a child. Remember
>> that kid next door, that didn't want to share anything he had ? Well,
>> thats just how it is between NASA and the Air Force. The TR3 is very
>> advanced, almost completely silent and can take off and land
>> vertically. It makes the new "space plane" an antique, before it
>> flies the first mission. Did you say that the government can't keep a
>> secret ? Many thousands have seen these vehicles, and they are called
>> the TR3 series, aka the Black Manta. The infamous "Black Triangles."
>> Do they exist ? Yes they do, and in the UK it is against the
>> National Secrets Act there to talk about one on TV, radio or in the
>> press. It is a punishable offense. But of course, you know you are
>> part of the unwashed masses, and therefore for your own good you must
>> be kept in the dark and fed BS. Otherwise known as the Mushroom
>> Treatment.
>> What did the Challenger disaster and the Columbia disaster have in
>> common? Each mission was the first time an Israeli national was to
>> fly in space. But of course, this is just a "coincidence."
>> NASA earned the nickname "Never A Straight Answer."
>> On the ill-fated morning of the Challenger disaster, an engineer
>> from a well known aerospace company went inside the pad, and
>> "twiddled" with controls on many systems, including the PMS. (Pad
>> Measurement System - which measures stresses in equipment. There are
>> temperature sensors, accelerometers and other transducers all through
>> the pad.) Then he left. I know because of a phone call I received
>> shortly after the accident about it. His actions caused that
>> important piece of equipment to be disabled, so that the LCC could no
>> longer monitor launch pad stresses. Now you ask, "as big as KSC is
>> (at least 25 miles across) how did they know who it was ?" Very
>> simple- the pad had a 12ft high chainlink fence around it topped with
>> razor wire, and, has its OWN GUARDHOUSE. They know exactly who it is.
>> And I do mean "he." Because he had to sign in at the gate. Because of
>> tampering with the PMS, no data at all was obtained during the launch
>> phase of Challenger. There is a remote/local selector switch on the
>> front panel of the PMS. It has a lighted upper and lower half with a
>> legend. The top is "LOCAL" and the bottom one is "REMOTE.". To change
>> this, you must lift the clear window and then press the button. This
>> made it impossible for someone to accidentally bump it. Even hitting
>> it with your fist won't affect it. But on that fateful morning, that
>> engineer did lift the cover and press the button.
>> Now think about this- tampering with launch pad equipment just
>> before launch. Who wouldn't call that "sabotage ?" Again, according
>> to the Rogers Commission Report, nothing like this happened
>> accordning to the report's Table of Contents at:
>> http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/51-l/docs/rogers-
>> commission/table-of-contents.html
>> Another incident happened that morning- soviet fishing trawlers
>> that usually came in close to shore to watch the launch, went far out
>> to sea an hour before. What did they know that you and I didn't, and
>> how did they know it ?
>> And finally others are beginning to talk. This article dated May
>> 2nd 2003 illustrates how far back the coverup on the shuttle goes,
>> incredibly all the way to Nixon. It is titled "Thirty Years of
>> Fudge": http://www.spacedaily.com/news/shuttle-03p1.html
>> NASA- THEATER AND DRAMA TO IMPRESS THE MASSES
>> Watching a NASA launch, is like going to the movie theater. Both
>> are fiction. The reason is, that NASA doesn't want to tell you the
>> reason for their existence, nor how and why their "disasters" happen.
>> Its not the people that work there. They are in the dark as you were,
>> before you read this article. Its the power people at the top, and in
>> the government. Those who are behind the scenes. They call the shots.
>> The US Space Command has technology now that Gene Roddenberry
>> couldn't imagine. But one quickly learns that its really all about
>> sandboxes and toyboxes. Just like when you were a child. Remember
>> that kid next door, that didn't want to share anything he had ? Well,
>> thats just how it is between NASA and the Air Force. It will be REAL
>> high technology like the gravity field driven TR3 that will take us
>> to planets in record time. Also, I ask Sean O'Keefe, the new
>> leadership, to take stock of his agency. Its a chance to begin anew,
>> without the endless lies. The american people are a far different
>> people, than they were back in the innocent days of Watergate. Now
>> more than 75% polled believe in life elsewhere. The excuse to coverup
>> the evidence of life on Mars is now obsolete. Clip.. Ted Twietmeyer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/enriched
Size: 6729 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://argon3.personal-web-hosting.com/pipermail/earthtimes_timestar.org/attachments/20040214/fcdebf22/attachment.bin
More information about the EarthTimes
mailing list